🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good first step," said one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who died after viewing dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to mimic the Australian example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international debate evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.